Environmental Initiatives

Media Inquiries

If you are a journalist and would like additional information, please visit the Media Contacts page.

Media Contacts

Subscribe to News Feeds

Pew offers news delivered to your desktop via RSS feed. Subscribing is easy. To learn more or get started, follow the link below.

Subscribe to News Feeds

For The Record

When Pew’s work is questioned or criticized we respond through letters to the editor or op-eds.

Read Pew's Responses

Animal Waste, Waterways, and Drinking Water

Opinion
Animal Waste, Waterways, and Drinking Water

Related Experts

  • Karen Steuer

    Karen Steuer

    Senior Director, Government Relations

    Read bio

     

See all of our Experts

Author(s)

Karen Steuer

Author(s) Description

Karen Steuer directs the Reforming Industrial Animal Agriculture campaign at the Pew Environment Group.

From the backyard grill to the picnic basket, Americans seem to have a love affair with meat and poultry. To supply that demand, livestock production has turned to concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) as the new business model, growing high volumes of cows, pigs, and poultry within short time spans and in the smallest spaces possible.

These “factory farms” are designed to be efficient at producing meat, but they also generate enormous amounts of manure. Livestock animals create 13 to 25 times more of it than humans, on a per-weight basis, resulting in quantities from a single large CAFO that can surpass the sanitary waste production of a city as large as Philadelphia. Treatment is not required for animal manure as it is for human sewage, so where does all of that waste go?

A growing body of evidence indicates that CAFO-generated contaminants are ending up in the waters that we depend on for commerce, recreation, and perhaps most importantly, drinking. Spills that occur during manure transport or when storage facilities fail can lead to easily discernible, significant impacts on water quality, as I explained in my previous blog entry.

More insidious though are the negative impacts resulting from the over-application of animal solid waste to crops. Spreading livestock manure in quantities greater than the plants can use or the soil can absorb can cause severe water quality problems and thereby harm human health. Although waste generated by the animal farm operator can be a valuable commodity when applied on land to help crops grow, the sheer scale of CAFOs distorts such usage.

Because CAFOs are often clustered within small areas and many farmers purchase livestock feed instead of growing it on adjacent land, the area available for manure disposal is rapidly vanishing. The U.S. Department of Agriculture brought this trend to light in 2000 when it found that the potential for water pollution from manure runoff was higher in those regions with the largest concentration of animals in confinement. More recent studies also point to CAFO density as a chief indicator of localized runoff and higher contaminant concentrations in water.

States must document the waters that have become degraded in order to comply with the federal Clean Water Act. These lists of impaired lakes, rivers, and streams illustrate that the manure generated from CAFOs is a significant contributor to decreased water quality in the nation’s watersheds—whether the source is production and waste management sites or manure-treated cropland. Unfortunately, that inventory does not fully capture the likely impacts of discharges from CAFOs because only 27.5 percent of rivers and streams and 45.5 percent of lakes nationally have been assessed.

We must recognize that CAFOs are among the substantial producers of pollutants to the waters we depend on. In my next blog entry, I’ll focus on the role that animal agriculture plays in one particularly troubled watershed: the Chesapeake Bay.

 

Related News and Resources

  • The Business of Broilers: Hidden Costs of Putting a Chicken on Every Grill

    • Report
    • Dec 20, 2013
    From chicken breeding to grocery store packaging, the 21st-century broiler chicken business is possibly the most industrialized sector in livestock agriculture. The industry is dominated by a handful of large corporations that own the birds, feed mills, cooking operations, and transportation networks.

    More

  • Pew Report Highlights Hidden Costs of Industrialized Poultry Production

    • Press Release
    • Dec 20, 2013
    Industrialized poultry production in the United States delivers considerable efficiencies, but the same system carries significant, hidden costs for the environment, for many communities where chickens are raised for industrial production, and sometimes for the chicken growers themselves, according to a report released today by The Pew Charitable Trusts.

    More

  • Organizations Urge President Obama to Protect our Nation's Waterways

    • Other Resource
    • Oct 28, 2013
    More than 350 organizations and more than 150 small businesses have urged President Obama to protect our nation's waterways from animal waste produced by industrial livestock operations.

    More

  • Pew Disappointed in EPA Plan to Study Impact of Industrial Livestock Operations on Chesapeake Bay

    • Press Release
    • Jun 05, 2013
    The Environmental Protection Agency announced today that it will assess the effectiveness of state efforts to keep livestock waste out of the Chesapeake Bay. In response, The Pew Charitable Trusts is urging President Barack Obama to fulfill his 2008 commitment to “strictly regulate pollution from large factory livestock farms.”

    More

  • EPA Delays Action on Regulations for Animal Agriculture

    • Other Resource
    • May 21, 2013
    Pollution from animal agriculture is threatening our nation’s waterways. Each year, livestock operations in the United States generate up to a billion tons of manure, much of it from concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs.

    More

  • Pew Responds to Op-Ed in the the Rapid City Journal

    • Opinion
    • Apr 24, 2013
    Josh Reichert responds to an op-ed published April 8, 2013 in the Rapid City Journal which was critical of Pew's animal agriculture work.

    More

  • Pew Urges Maryland Lawmakers to Reject Chesapeake Bay Pollution Exemption Bill

    • Press Release
    • Apr 02, 2013
    The Maryland House of Delegates’ Environmental Matters Committee today will hold a hearing on Senate Bill 1029, establishing the Maryland Agricultural Certainty Program. In anticipation of the hearing, Pew has released the following statement.

    More

  • Pew Testimony in Opposition to SB 1029

    • Other Resource
    • Mar 19, 2013
    Velma Smith of The Pew Charitable Trusts’ campaign to reform animal agriculture testified before the Maryland State Senate on the Maryland Agriculture Certainty Program.

    More

  • Lack of Information on Livestock Facilities Spells Trouble in Illinois and Beyond

    • Opinion
    • Oct 16, 2012
    The Chesapeake Bay is not the only area affected by pollution from CAFOs. In Illinois, for example, water quality problems have caused real concern about that state’s regulation of the rapidly growing hog industry.

    More

  • Fair Share for Clean Water

    • Opinion
    • Oct 14, 2012
    An editorial by The Frederick News-Post ("Cost of the bay," Sept. 7) raised a good point regarding the need for all neighboring states to share the responsibility of controlling pollutants entering the Chesapeake Bay.

    More

  • Remarks from Karen Steuer on CAFO Pollution and the Public Outcry for Stronger Regulation

    • Other Resource
    • Oct 11, 2012
    Karen Steuer, who directs the Pew Environment Group’s campaign to reform animal agriculture, made the following remarks today on the strong public support, and the critical need, for a new rule to limit pollution from concentrated animal feeding operations.

    More

  • The Chesapeake's Manure Problem

    • Opinion
    • Sep 04, 2012

    2012-09-04 What do 2,700 plant species, 525 species of fin and shell-fish, and more than 17 million people have in common? They are all residents of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The bay provides economic benefits of more than $33 billion a year from recreational and commercial activities, including the ha

    More

  • Infographic: Cleaning Up CAFO Permit Rules

    • Other Resource
    • Aug 27, 2012

    Some of our Nation’s most prized waterways—such as the Great Lakes, Chesapeake Bay and Mississippi River—as well as streams, estuaries and wells, are at risk from pollution from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs).

    More

  • Cleaning Up Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Permit Rules

    • Data Visualization
    • Aug 27, 2012

    Additional Resources Pollution Coming to a Waterway Near You? Action Alert Animal Agriculture Must Do Its Share to Protect Our Waterways Cleaning Up the Chesapeake Bay Some of our nation’s most prized waterways—such as the Great Lakes, Chesapeake

    More

  • Pollution: Coming to a Waterway Near You?

    • Other Resource
    • Aug 20, 2012
    The health of many waterways, from the Chesapeake Bay to the Great Lakes—and the livelihoods, flora, and fauna they support— are in jeopardy.

    More

See more...

X
Sign In

Member Sign In

Forgot Password?
Submit Not a Member? Join!
X

Forgot Password?

Send Password Not a Member? Join!
X

Change Password

X
(All Fields are required)
Send Message
Share this on: