Environmental Initiatives

Media Inquiries

If you are a journalist and would like additional information, please visit the Media Contacts page.

Media Contacts

Subscribe to News Feeds

Pew offers news delivered to your desktop via RSS feed. Subscribing is easy. To learn more or get started, follow the link below.

Subscribe to News Feeds

For The Record

When Pew’s work is questioned or criticized we respond through letters to the editor or op-eds.

Read Pew's Responses

America's Fishing Law on the Line

Related Experts

  • Debbie Salamone

    Debbie Salamone

    Officer, Communications

    Read bio

     

See all of our Experts

Author(s)

Debbie Salamone

Author(s) Description

Debbie Salamone is a communications manager at the Pew Environment Group.

In a blog post special to DiscoveryNews, Debbie Salamone discusses the value of the nation's Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Enjoyed some tasty New England scallops lately? Reeled in a Gulf of Mexico red snapper? Feasted on some mid-Atlantic summer flounder?

Aside from your fishing talents or culinary prowess, you have federal fishery law to thank. Like many other fish, these species, which were once at dangerously low levels, are in better shape today because of protections designed to prevent and stop overfishing—taking fish faster than they can reproduce.

Wednesday, April 13, marks the 35th anniversary of the nation’s first comprehensive fishing law, most recently named the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. It has helped promote America’s fishing industry and saved dwindling species, but is now at the center of debate.

To give some declining species a chance to repopulate, fishing is either off limits or catch is severely restricted in certain areas. Some fishermen complain those measures are hurting them economically, and they believe the law is too strict. Others believe safeguards for certain species need to be carried out better to successfully rebuild fish populations. The Pew Environment Group supports this position. In the midst of this debate, Congress convened an oversight hearing last month to discuss how the law is working.

The MSA was originally enacted in 1976 to eliminate rampant foreign fishing off the U.S. coast and promote the domestic fishing industry. It was reauthorized in 1996 to change focus from promoting fishing to conserving fish. And in 2006 it was strengthened to set deadlines for fishery managers to approve scientifically sound limits on catches that do not allow overfishing. When properly implemented, the MSA can deliver robust fish populations.

Take Gulf of Mexico red snapper, for example: one of many MSA success stories. Science-based fishing limits that do not allow overfishing have helped the species grow older and reach its best spawning years. Early evidence shows that red snapper are more plentiful and spreading over a wider area. Allowable catch has been increased, and that trend is expected to continue as the species further recovers.

During the last 20 years, the amount of fishing has skyrocketed, boosted in part by federal programs and technology that help fishermen easily find their targets. These decades of unsustainable fishing in some parts of the country have caused certain populations to collapse and dozens of others to plummet to dangerously low levels, causing enormous losses for fishermen, coastal communities and the ocean ecosystem.

The MSA is designed to get all of this under control by requiring fishery managers to set scientifically sound limits on catch. But some fishermen say they don’t believe in the data behind those restrictions. Scientists have made progress on the difficult process of studying fish, and we must act on the information at hand or risk further depleting our oceans of valuable species.

Congress should maintain its commitment to manage our ocean fish wisely. Now is the time to stay the course because the long-term reward is around the corner.

 

Related News and Resources

  • National Geographic: A Better Way to Protect Our Ocean Ecosystems

    • Opinion
    • Apr 02, 2014
    The application of new science, along with critical reforms of key laws and regulations, is leading to more effective policies to manage America’s ocean fisheries.

    More

  • Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management

    • Fact Sheet
    • Mar 20, 2014
    Ensuring the long-term health of important marine species will depend upon our ability to understand and account for the interactions among those species, their environment, and the people who rely upon them for food, commerce, and sport.

    More

  • Pew Comments on Offshore Angler Permit Proposal

    • Other Resource
    • Apr 10, 2014
    On behalf of The Pew Charitable Trusts, Chad W. Hanson, Officer of the U.S. Oceans Southeast, submitted comments to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission regarding the proposed Gulf Offshore Recreational Fishing Permit (offshore permit).

    More

  • Pew Comments on Amendment 28 to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan

    • Other Resource
    • Mar 25, 2014
    On March 25, 2014, Chad W. Hanson of The Pew Charitable Trusts wrote a letter to Doug Boyd, Chairman of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, regarding Amendment 28 to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan [Red Snapper Allocation].

    More

X
Sign In

Member Sign In

Forgot Password?
Submit Not a Member? Join!
X

Forgot Password?

Send Password Not a Member? Join!
X

Change Password

X
(All Fields are required)
Send Message
Share this on: