Environmental Initiatives

Media Inquiries

If you are a journalist and would like additional information, please visit the Media Contacts page.

Media Contacts

Subscribe to News Feeds

Pew offers news delivered to your desktop via RSS feed. Subscribing is easy. To learn more or get started, follow the link below.

Subscribe to News Feeds

For The Record

When Pew’s work is questioned or criticized we respond through letters to the editor or op-eds.

Read Pew's Responses

Summary: Oil Spill Prevention and Response in the U.S. Arctic Ocean

Related Resources

In 2010, the Pew Environment Group commissioned Oil Spill Prevention and Response in the U.S. Arctic Ocean, a comprehensive study of the challenges and potential consequences of oil and gas exploration and production in the U.S. Arctic Ocean. The study examined what might happen if a catastrophic spill occurred in the Arctic.

Key Findings

  • The U.S. government and the industry have underestimated the risks of a catastrophic blowout.
  • Technology to sufficiently clean up oil in broken ice is unproved, and technologies that do work are limited by darkness, fog, hurricane-strength winds, sea ice, and other environmental factors.
  • The oil and gas industry’s spill-response plans fail to realistically account for the harsh climate, including long periods during which conditions would render response impossible.
  • The industry’s spill-response plans fail to account for the remoteness of possible drilling locations in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas off Alaska’s northern coast. No roads link the Chukchi’s coast to the rest of Alaska. The nearest major port (Dutch Harbor, in the Aleutian Islands) is 1,300 nautical miles from Point Barrow, where the Beaufort and Chukchi seas meet. The nearest U.S. Coast Guard Air Station is 950 air miles away in Kodiak, Alaska.
  • The industry’s spill-response plans make unrealistic assumptions that 95 percent of spilled oil would be contained or recovered. Under much more moderate conditions in the Gulf of Mexico, only 17 percent of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill was recovered through subsea containment and only 3 percent by mechanical skimming.
  • Although considerable research has been conducted in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas, significant science gaps remain, and little baseline science exists for measuring the effects of an oil spill on Arctic ecosystems.

Chart: Environmental Factors and Response Gaps

Map: Comparison of Distances in Alaska and the Lower 48 States

About the Report's Authors

Nuka Research & Planning Group LLC and Pearson Consulting are consulting firms with internationally recognized expertise in oil spill prevention and response.

Fact Sheet File: Summary: Oil Spill Prevention and Response in the U.S. Arctic Ocean


Related News and Resources

  • New Report on Food Security in Northern Canada Cites Need to Protect Environment

    • Other Resource
    • Mar 27, 2014
    A report on food security in northern Canada, released today by the Council of Canadian Academies, highlights the importance of a healthy marine environment in sustaining traditional diets for Inuit and Aboriginal peoples, says Henry Huntington, The Pew Charitable Trusts' Arctic science director.


  • Exxon Valdez Spill, 25 Years Later

    • Other Resource
    • Mar 21, 2014
    Just before midnight March 24, 1989, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez struck Bligh Reef in Alaska, causing the largest oil spill in U.S. history to that point. In the weeks that followed, a shocked world watched as the tanker spewed approximately 11 million gallons of oil into the formerly pristine and delicate Prince William Sound.


Sign In

Member Sign In

Forgot Password?
Submit Not a Member? Join!

Forgot Password?

Send Password Not a Member? Join!

Change Password

(All Fields are required)
Send Message
Share this on: