Environmental Initiatives

Media Inquiries

If you are a journalist and would like additional information, please visit the Media Contacts page.

Media Contacts

Subscribe to News Feeds

Pew offers news delivered to your desktop via RSS feed. Subscribing is easy. To learn more or get started, follow the link below.

Subscribe to News Feeds

For The Record

When Pew’s work is questioned or criticized we respond through letters to the editor or op-eds.

Read Pew's Responses

CITES 2013: Introduction from the Sea

Fact Sheet

  

Contacts:

Jo Benn, +1 202.247.5823, jbenn@pewtrusts.org
Rachel Brittin, 202.540.6312, rbrittin@pewtrusts.org

Adam BaskeIssues surrounding the term “introduction from the sea” (IFS) urgently need to be resolved at the 16th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16) in March 2013 in Bangkok, so countries will have a common understanding of what is required when CITES-listed species are taken on the high seas. The term introduction from the sea— in the text of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora—covers the procedures that countries need to follow when a CITES listed species is “taken in the marine environment not under the jurisdiction of any State.”

Parties are required to implement the Convention for CITES-listed specimens that are taken outside the jurisdiction of any State, regardless of decisions or resolutions of the CoP that interpret this provision or provide guidance. However, the Parties have decided to work to fi nd a common understanding of how this provision should be implemented and to improve understanding, consistency, and compliance.

An official IFS working group has been meeting since the last CoP to resolve questions of interpretation related to introduction from the sea. Several issues were resolved by the Parties at CoP15 and before; the remaining issue centers on which country is required to issue the CITES permits or certificates—the port State (where the vessel docks and lands its catch), or the fl ag State (where the vessel is registered).

Significant progress has been made toward finding a solution to this long-standing discussion, which will go to CoP16 in Bangkok for a final decision. In summary, the proposed solution provides:

  • If a vessel fishing beyond national jurisdiction lands its catch on its own shores, then that country is responsible for issuing documentation and complying with all IFS requirements. If the fishing vessel’s fl ag State and the p ort State are different, then the former would issue a CITES export permit. The State that receives the species caught on the high seas will treat it as an import.
  • The only remaining complication concerns vessels that are chartered by one State and flagged to another; that issue is still under debate.

The IFS working group was collaborative, and accepted a compromise that when there is a signed agreement between the States, pursuant to a Regional Fisheries Management Organization, and it has been submitted to the CITES Secretariat, then the chartering State, and not the fl ag State, can be responsible. This draft resolution will now be submitted to the CoP for adoption and is likely to receive support from the majority of CITES Parties.

CITES 2013

Fact Sheet File: CITES 2013: Introduction from the Sea (PDF)

 

Related News and Resources

  • Chinese Business Executives Lead the Way on Shark Conservation

    • Other Resource
    • Apr 22, 2014

    Four of China’s most successful business executives have been recognized as “Global Shark Guardians” for their work securing a ban on shark fin soup at Chinese state banquets. On April 17, The Pew Charitable Trusts, The Nature Conservancy, and WildAid honored Guo Guangchang, Wan Jie, Ding Liguo, and Zhang “Jim” Xingsheng at the annual meeting of the China-U.S. Business Leaders Roundtable in New York.

    More

X
Sign In

Member Sign In

Forgot Password?
Submit Not a Member? Join!
X

Forgot Password?

Send Password Not a Member? Join!
X

Change Password

X
(All Fields are required)
Send Message
Share this on: